MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898497208 · doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.710.296

Impact of Eel Training Programmes on the Farming Community - A Follow up Study in Karnataka

2018· article· en· W2898497208 on OpenAlexaff
C Padma Veni, K.S. Purnima

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Economics and Practices
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)AgricultureBusinessFisheryGeographySocioeconomicsBiologyEconomicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information, communication and population explosion along with science and technology in agriculture and allied sectors ale influencing the changes in the ideologies and objectives of the society. While the policies and programmes are formulated to generate and utilize the new resources, training of the people and personnel is seen as an integral part of development effort and also as means and ends of social change. Focusing on the faster growth of development in agriculture and allied sectors, a large number of training institutions have been established across the length and breadth of the country to achieve self-sufficiency in their respective sectors with the training effort at all levels. Still we need to meet the requirements of our larger population living below poverty line with continuous and well managed training programmes. Since training is a very costly affair involving number of inter connecting activities, it is highly essential for the training institutes and sponsoring organizations to know the effects of training programmes for the end users. With this in view, a two member team of EEl faculty (the authors) have taken up a follow-up study on training programmes conducted by Extension Education Institute, Rajendranagar. Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh in three districts of Karnataka state namely Belgaurn, Bagalkote and Bijapur with an objective of assessing the extent of applicability of training programmes at field level and documenting the success cases. The overall applicability of the training programmes conducted by EEl was assessed from 58 trainees administering a structured questionnaire. Group wise discussions and presentations were also organized to bring out a few success cases that brought significant changes at field level. It was overwhelming to note that a majority of trainees (67%) expressed EEl trainings were useful to a greater extent at field level because of need based, practically applicable and well-designed content of trainings. The follow up team also interacted with the farmers and observed changes that occurred due to various interventions and documented the success cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied SciencesSame topicAgricultural Economics and PracticesFrench-language works237,207