MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898509389 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23373

Intrinsic dissolution kinetics and topochemistry of xylan, mannan, and lignin during auto‐hydrolysis of red maple wood meal

2018· article· en· W2898509389 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rory Jara, Martin Lawoko, Adriaan van Heiningen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXylanCelluloseLigninSoftwoodHardwoodKineticsDissolutionChemistryMannanHydrolysisAqueous solutionChemical engineeringPolysaccharideOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceBotanyComposite materialBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High temperature aqueous treatment of wood is the preferred technology for deconstructing lignocellulosics. Many studies have been carried out on the kinetics and mechanism of hot‐water extraction. However, most were performed in batch or integral plug flow reactors, which are not optimal for measuring intrinsic dissolution kinetics of the lignocellulosic components. Therefore, we used a continuous mixed batch reactor (or Berty reactor) to determine the intrinsic dissolution kinetics of xylan, mannan, and lignin from milled hardwood (Acer rubrum) at three different temperatures (150, 160, and 170 °C) and four constant pH values: 2, 3, 4, and 5. During the initial phase of autohydrolysis (carbohydrate‐free), lignin and (lignin‐free) xylan dissolve starting at a high rate and then a slowly decreasing rate, respectively. This is followed by the dissolution of xylan‐lignin complexes and finally cellulose xylan complexes when cellulose has been significantly hydrolysed. The kinetics and molecular weight distribution of the removed wood polymers are used to describe the topochemistry of autohydrolysis based on recent knowledge of the ultrastructure of hardwood fibres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicLignin and Wood ChemistryFrench-language works237,207