Adult Māori Patients’ Healthcare Experiences of the Emergency Department in a District Health Facility in New Zealand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Globally, there are significant inequalities and disparities in health service delivery to Indigenous populations, including Māori in Aotearoa/New Zealand. This study explored the experiences of adult Māori patients in the emergency department (ED) of a district health facility in New Zealand. Qualitative research exploring the ED experiences of Māori patients is limited. Two semistructured interviews with 4 Māori participants were conducted, audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed with the help of the Māori health department within the hospital. The participants identified 3 main areas of improvements relating to (a) the ED environment, (b) the interactions with healthcare professionals (HCPs), and (c) the unique factors faced by the kaumātua (Māori elders). The main conclusions were that aspects of the ED environment, including the room layout and lack of privacy, could negatively influence Maori ED experiences. In addition, HCPs not adequately integrating the Māori view of health in their clinical practice also had a negative influence. The kaumātua faced unique challenges, including the language barrier and lack of sufficient information from HCPs during their patient journey. Educating HCPs and making the ED environment more sensitive to Māori could improve their experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".