Eccentricity is Not Responsible for Odd Harmonics in HAT-P-7 and Kepler-13A
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The exquisite photometry of Kepler has revealed reflected light from exoplanets, tidal distortion of host stars and Doppler beaming of a star's light due to its motion (Borucki 2016; Demory et al. 2012; Welsh et al. 2010; Bloemen et al. 2012). Esteves et al. (2013, 2015) and Shporer et al. (2014) reported additional odd harmonics in the light curves of two hot Jupiters: HAT-P-7b and Kepler-13Ab. They measured non-zero power at three times the orbital frequency that persisted while the planet was eclipsed and hence must originate in the star (Esteves et al. 2015). Penoyre & Sandford (2018) showed that orbital eccentricity could result in time-dependent tidal deformation of the star that manifests itself at three times the orbital frequency and suggested this could be the origin of the measured odd modes. In this Research Note, we show that the small orbital eccentricities of HAT-P-7b and Kepler-13Ab cannot generate the odd harmonics observed in these systems. Esteves et al. (2015) hypothesized that the odd modes could be due to tidal distortion of the star if its spin is misaligned with the system's orbital motion, as is the case in both of these systems (Benomar et al. 2014; Herman et al. 2018), but this mechanism has yet to be verified theoretically or numerically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".