MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-time Context-aware learning System for IoT Applications

2022· article· en· W2898572688 on OpenAlexaff
Bhaskar Das, Jalal Almhana, Lutful Karim

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsSeneca PolytechnicUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Mobile deviceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMobile computingContext switchContext awarenessServerReal-time computingContext modelInternet of ThingsDistributed computingEmbedded systemComputer networkOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a real-time context-aware learning system that runs on mobile devices, collects data from the sensors, learns about the user-defined context, makes predictions in real-time, and manage IoT devices accordingly. However, the computational power of the mobile devices makes it challenging to run machine-learning algorithms with acceptable accuracy. Hence, existing works implement machine-learning algorithms on the server and transmit the results to the mobile devices. Although the context-aware predictions made by the server are more accurate than their mobile counterpart is it heavily depends on the network connection for the delivery of the results to the devices, which negatively affects real-time context learning. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a context-learning algorithm for mobile devices, which is less demanding on the computational resources and maintains the accuracy of the prediction by updating itself from the learning parameters obtained from the server periodically. Experimental results show that the proposed lightweight context-learning algorithm can achieve mean accuracy up to 97.51% while mean execution time requires only 11ms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications ConferenceSame topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207