MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898590494 · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy287.079

Pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC): The phase II KEYNOTE-629 study

2018· article· en· W2898590494 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa Licitra, Lillian L. Siu, Ezra E.W. Cohen, P. Zhang, Ramona F. Swaby, Kevin J. Harrington

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersEMD SeronoGenentechMorphoSysSwedish Orphan BiovitrumAstellas PharmaRegeneron PharmaceuticalsEisaiGlaxoSmithKlineMerckSymphogenBristol-Myers SquibbAstraZenecaAmgenPfizer
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse EventsTolerabilityResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsInternal medicineOncologyAdverse effectClinical endpointPhases of clinical researchHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaCancerSurgeryClinical trialHead and neck cancerImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: There are no approved treatments or standard of care for recurrent or metastatic cSCC. Effectiveness of common therapies for cSCC is limited. Regimens effective for SCC of the head and neck (HNSCC) may also be effective for cSCC. Pembrolizumab is a programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor that directly blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. Evidence of pembrolizumab efficacy and safety has been shown in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC in the phase 1b KEYNOTE-012 study. The single-arm, open-label phase 2 KEYNOTE-629 trial will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic cSCC (NCT03284424). Trial design: Patients will be given pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks by intravenous infusion, continued for 35 doses (∼2 years) or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, intercurrent illness, nonadherence, or investigator or patient decision to withdraw. Radiographic imaging will be performed every 6 weeks for year 1 and every 9 weeks thereafter. Adverse events will be monitored and graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Key inclusion criteria are age ≥18 years; histologically confirmed cSCC as the primary site of malignancy; metastatic disease or locally recurrent disease not curable by surgery or radiation; measurable disease per RECIST v1.1; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1. There is no requirement for prior chemotherapy or biological systemic treatment for incurably recurrent/metastatic disease. Primary end point is objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points are duration of response, disease control rate (complete or partial response or stable disease for ≥12 weeks), progression-free survival per RECIST v1.1, overall survival, safety, and tolerability. Pharmacokinetics, biomarkers, and health-related quality of life will be evaluated as exploratory end points. Recruitment is ongoing in 10 countries and will continue until 100 patients are enrolled. Clinical trial identification: NCT03284424. Trial initiated September 15, 2017. Editorial acknowledgement: Medical writing and/or editorial assistance was provided by Matthew Grzywacz, PhD, of the ApotheCom pembrolizumab team (Yardley, PA, USA). This assistance was funded by Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Legal entity responsible for the study: Merck & Co, Inc. Funding: Merck & Co, Inc. Disclosure: L.F. Licitra: Consultant: Eisai, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Debiopharm Gropu, AstraZeneca, Sobi, Novartis, Bayer, Merck, Merck Serono, Roche, BMS; Research funding: Eisai, Amgen, Merck Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, Merck. L.L. Siu: Consultant: Merck, AstraZeneca/Medimmune, MorphoSys, Symphogen; Research funding: BMS, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Medimmune, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Amgen, Symphogen, Astellas. E.E.W. Cohen: Consultant: Merck, BMS, AstraZeneca, Human Longevity, Inc, Pfizer, EMD Serono. P. Zhang: Employment and travel: Merck, B. Gumuscu, R. Swaby: Employment and stock: Merck. K. Harrington: Honoraria, Consultant, Speakers Bureau: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, BMS; Research funding: AstraZeneca, Merck; Travel: Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of OncologySame topicNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207