MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Iterative Invertible Clipping Method for PAPR Reduction in Wireless MC-CDMA Communication Systems

2018· article· en· W2898617910 on OpenAlexaff
Mokhtaria Mesri, Yaçine Merrad, Larbi Talbi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sensors Wireless Communications and Control · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdditive white Gaussian noiseAlgorithmClipping (morphology)Bit error rateComputer scienceRayleigh fadingCode division multiple accessOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingMathematicsElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)FadingTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background & Objective: One of the disadvantages of Multi-carrier Code Division Multiple Access (MC-CDMA) system is the high value of Peak to Average Power Ratio (PAPR). This paper proposes an approach called Iterative Invertible Clipping Method (IICM) to address the PAPR for MC-CDMA signal based on wireless communication system characteristics. This is mainly concentrated in clipping function making use of a polynomial of degree three at the transmitter, and its inverse at the receiver, to recover the original signal. Method: A Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)-based frequency domain filter is employed to reduce the overall peak regrowth which is supported by measuring the Adjacent Channel Power Ratio (ACPR) after soft clipping and filtering. This technique is compared with Ragusa method using a polynomial of degree 5. Result: The simulated results of the proposed method showed better performance in terms of PAPR reduction, Bit Error Rate (BER), and computational complexity requiring two iterations only. The Complementary Cumulative Complementary Density Function (CCDF) is served to measure and improve PAPR performance of the system. Conclusion: The channel coding process is applied to strengthen the obtained results in the Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel and fading channel (Rayleigh). The High-Power Amplifier (HPA) is used for validation purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sensors Wireless Communications and ControlSame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207