MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898664321 · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2018.07.021

An open-label randomized controlled trial of low-dose corticosteroid plus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus standard corticosteroid treatment for minimal change nephrotic syndrome in adults (MSN Study)

2018· article· en· W2898664321 on OpenAlexafffund
Philippe Rémy, Vincent Audard, Pierre André Natella, Gaëlle Pellé, Bertrand Dussol, Hélène Leray‐Moragues, Cécile Vigneau, Khedidja Bouachi, Jacques Dantal, Laurence Vrigneaud, Alexandre Karras, Frank Pourcine, Philippe Gatault, Philippe Grimbert, Nawelle Ait Sahlia, Anissa Moktefi, Éric Daugas, Claire Rigothier, Sylvie Bastuji‐Garin, Dil Sahali, Jean‐Claude Aldigier, Pierre Bataille, Bernard Canaud, Dominique Chauveau, Christian Combe, Gabriel Choukroun, Emilie Cornec-Legall, Karine Dahan, Michel Delahousse, Dominique Desvaux, P. Deteix, Antoine Dürrbach, Vincent Esnault, Marie Essig, P Fiévet, T. Frouget, Dominique Guerrot, M. Godin, Annie Gontiers-Picard, Morgane Gosselin, Catherine Hanrotel‐Saliou, Anne-Elisabeth Heng, Antoine Huart, Antoine Humbert, Tomek Kofman, Aurélie Hummel, Philippe Lang, Maurice Laville, Yannick Le Meur, Paolo Malvezzi, Marie Matignon, Rafik Mesbah, Bruno Moulin, Sandrine Muller, Jérôme Olagne, Agathe Pardon, François Provôt, Guillaume Queffeulou, Emmanuelle Plaisier, Quentin Raimbourg, Philippe Rieu, Thomas Stehlé, P Vanhille

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
FundersMinistry of Health, British Columbia
KeywordsCorticosteroidMedicineNephrotic syndromeEnteric coatedOpen labelRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineGastroenterologyUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueKidney InternationalSame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207