Investigation of wrapped effects on bow‐tie antenna with and without resistive loading for pulsed radar applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of the wrapped bow‐tie antenna with and without resistive loading are explored for pulsed radar applications. The antenna characteristics such as voltage standing wave ratio, input impedance, reflected pulse of the antennas and radiated electric field are investigated by fully wrapping the planar bow‐tie antenna. The antenna characteristics of the loaded antennas are shown to be robust with respect to the deformation of the planar bow‐tie antenna. The peak‐to‐peak antenna reflected voltages of the conventional bow‐tie planar antenna (PA) and bow‐tie wrapped antenna (WA) are 0.24 and 0.49 V, respectively, whereas those of the resistor‐loaded PA (RPA) and the resistor‐loaded WA (RWA) are 0.23 and 0.25 V, respectively. The calculated figure of merit of the PA and WA are −4.58 and −7.92 dB, respectively, whereas those of the RPA and RWA are −20 and −18.42 dB, respectively. On the basis of the performance evaluation, the pulse radiating performance of the resistively loaded antennas is shown to be stable with respect to the deformation of the planar bow‐tie antenna.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".