Local Expression of Indoleamine 2,3, Dioxygenase Prolongs Allogenic Skin Graft Take in a Mouse Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Objective: Despite the effectiveness of skin autotransplantation, the high degree of immunogenicity of the skin precludes the use of allografts and systemic immunosuppression is generally inappropriate for isolated skin grafts. Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO) is a potent immunoregulatory factor with allo- and autoimmune suppression and tolerance induction properties. This study examines the potential use of locally expressed IDO to prolong the allogeneic skin graft take in a mouse model. Approach: Syngeneic-fibroblasts were transfected with noncompetent IDO viral vector and the level of Kynurenine (Kyn) in conditioned medium was measured as an index for IDO activity. Either 1 or 3 × 10 6 IDO-fibroblasts were introduced intra/hypo-dermally to the mouse skin. The expression, localization, and functionality of IDO were then evaluated. The cell-injected areas were harvested and grafted on the back of allogeneic mice. The graft survival, immune-cells infiltration, and interaction with dendritic cells were evaluated. Results: The results showed a significant improvement in allogeneic graft take injected with 1 × 106 IDO-fibroblasts (18.4 ± 3.3 days) compared with control (12.2 ± 1.9 days). This duration increased to 35.4 ± 4.7 days in grafts injected with 3 × 10 6 IDO-expressing cells. This observation might be due to a significantly lower T cells infiltration within the IDO-grafts. Further, the result of a flow cytometric analysis showed that the expression of PD-L1/PD-L2 on CD11c+/eFluor+ cells in the regional lymph nodes of injected skin areas was significantly higher in IDO groups compared with control. Conclusion: These data suggest that allogeneic skin graft survival outcome can be prolonged significantly by local overexpression of IDO without any systemic effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".