MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898684208 · doi:10.3747/co.25.4018

Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Testing in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Clinical Practice—Frequency and Indications

2018· article· en· W2898684208 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Shannon Wong, Bakul I. Dalal, Heather A. Leitch

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver General Hospital
FundersNational Comprehensive Cancer Network
KeywordsParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaMedicineMyelodysplastic syndromesCD59HemoglobinuriaInternal medicineAnemiaGastroenterologyBone marrowPancytopeniaImmunologyBone marrow failureComplement systemHaematopoiesisStem cellAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is characterized by peripheral blood cytopenias, with most patients developing significant anemia and dependence on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. In paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), mutations in the PIGA gene lead to lack of cell-surface glycosylphosphatidylinositol, allowing complement-mediated lysis to occur. Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria results in direct antiglobulin test–negative hemolysis and cytopenias, and up to 50% of patients with MDS test positive for PNH cells. We wanted to determine whether PNH is considered to be a contributor to anemia in MDS. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of MDS confirmed by bone-marrow biopsy since 2009 were reviewed. Highresolution PNH testing by flow cytometry examined FLAER (fluorescein-labeled proaerolysin) binding and expression of CD14, CD15, CD24, CD45, CD59, CD64, and CD235 on neutrophils, monocytes, and RBCS. Results: In 152 patients with MDS diagnosed in 2009 or later, the MDS diagnosis included subtypes associated with PNH positivity (refractory anemia, n = 7, and hypoplastic MDS, n = 4). Of 11 patients who underwent PNH testing, 1 was positive (9.0%). Reasons for PNH testing were anemia (n = 3), new MDS diagnosis (n = 2), hypoplastic MDS (n = 2), decreased haptoglobin (n = 1), increased RBC transfusion requirement (n = 1), and unexplained iron deficiency (n = 1). Conclusions: Testing for PNH was infrequent in MDS patients, and the criteria for testing were heterogeneous. Clinical indicators prompted PNH testing in 6 of 11 patients. Given that effective treatment is now available for PNH and that patients with PNH-positive MDS can respond to immunosuppressive therapy, PNH testing in MDS should be considered. Prospective analyses to clarify the clinical significance of PNH positivity in MDS are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent OncologySame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207