MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898690329 · doi:10.1111/aji.13068

Type I interferons differentially modulate maternal host immunity to infection by <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> and <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar Typhimurium during pregnancy

2018· article· en· W2898690329 on OpenAlexafffund
Gerard Agbayani, Kristina Wachholz, Shawn P. Murphy, Subash Sad, Lakshmi Krishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Reproductive Immunology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Research Council CanadaNational Institutes of HealthNational Research Council Sri Lanka
KeywordsListeria monocytogenesSalmonella entericaImmune systemBiologySpleenImmunityImmunologyMonocyteSalmonellaMicrobiologySalmonella infectionSerotypeCytokineBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problem IFN‐alpha receptor deficiency (IFNAR −/− ) enhances immunity to Listeria monocytogenes (LM) and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (ST) in the non‐pregnant state by inhibiting pathogen‐induced immune cell death. However, the roles of IFNAR signaling in modulating immunity to infection during pregnancy are not well understood. Method of Study C57BL/6J wild‐type (WT) and IFNAR −/− mice were infected systemically with LM or ST. Bacterial burden in spleen and individual placentas was enumerated at day 3 post‐infection. Immune cell numbers and percentages were quantified in spleen and individual placentas, respectively, through flow cytometry. Cytokine expression in serum, spleen, and individual placentas was measured through cytometric bead array. Results IFNAR −/− mice exhibited decreased splenic monocyte numbers in non‐pregnant and pregnant state, and an altered distribution of placental immune cell types in the non‐infected state. IFNAR −/− mice controlled LM infection more effectively than WT mice even during pregnancy. This correlated with enhanced serum IL‐12 expression, despite reduced splenic monocyte numbers relative to WT controls. In contrast, pregnant IFNAR −/− mice unlike their non‐pregnant counterparts exhibited increased susceptibility to ST infection, which was associated with decreased serum IL‐12 expression. Conclusion Type I IFN responses differentially impact host resistance to LM and ST infection during pregnancy through modulation of immune cell distribution and cytokine responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Reproductive ImmunologySame topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207