Resource Management in Multicloud IoT Radio Access Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloud radio access network (CRAN) is a promising approach to provide ubiquitous and on demand access to future Internet of Things (IoT) networks. The existing CRANs assume a single cloud which suffers from computational complexity and signaling latency to support massive number of IoT devices in large scale network deployments. This paper focuses on the scheduling of IoT devices in a multicloud IoT network scenario. This paper considers the downlink of an IoT network consisting of multiple clouds, each coordinates a cluster of several base stations (BSs) allowing joint signal processing. The transmit frame of each BS is composed of several resource blocks (RBs). The multiple clouds are linked to the central cloud which performs scheduling of IoT devices and synchronization of transmit frames. The work models the IoT devices to RBs assignment problem considering the intercloud and intracloud interference. The optimization problem maximizes the overall network utilization under practical network constraints. Further, this paper also proposes a low complexity heuristic algorithm to solve the constraint resource allocation problem in linear time. Complexity analysis of proposed algorithm is carried out and simulations results for a number of IoT network scenarios demonstrate that proposed solution is numerically accurate and performs close to the optimal solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".