MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898789738 · doi:10.1002/cpmb.79

Polysome Profiling Analysis of mRNA and Associated Proteins Engaged in Translation

2018· article· en· W2898789738 on OpenAlexafffund
Eric S. Pringle, Craig McCormick, Zhenyu Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols in Molecular Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsBeatrice Hunter Cancer Research InstituteDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPolysomeMessenger RNATranslation (biology)Gene expressionGene expression profilingRNABiologyRibosome profilingMolecular biologyProtein biosynthesisSucrose gradientUltracentrifugeGeneRibosomeChemistryCell biologyBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post-transcriptional regulation is an important aspect of the control of gene expression. mRNAs are translated with variable efficiencies, and these efficiencies can change rapidly during adaptation to diverse environmental factors, including cellular stresses and microbial infections. Polysome profiling analysis utilizes ultracentrifugation to isolate complexes of mRNAs in the process of translation and corresponding proteins on the basis of density. Here we describe polysome profiling analysis using a continuous ultraviolet spectrophotometer and a gradient fractionator. We provide protocols for processing sucrose gradient fractions for isolation of RNA for RT-qPCR analysis and isolation of protein for SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Protocols in Molecular BiologySame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207