Effect of Dry Heat Temperature and Moist Heat Pressure on Canola Meal for Ruminant Utilisation. Part II: Maillard Reaction Product Formation and Structural Characteristics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of a range of barrel dry heat temperatures (20 to 180 oC), and moist heat pressure (MHP) (120 oC 15 min 192 kPa) on Maillard reaction product (MRP) formation and canola meal structural characteristics were investigated. Increasing dry heat temperature was negatively correlated with meal whiteness L* and yellowness b* (early-MRP) and positively with surface hydrophobicity. Relative to control meal, MHP increased early-MRP, redness, browning index (late-MRP), and acidity; and decreased L*, surface hydrophobicity, b*, and Abs294nm (intermediate-MRP). Dry heat-associated changes in surface hydrophobicity suggest protein unfolding and side-chain modifications. Lack of high MW polypeptides at dry heat temperatures of 160 and 180 oC imply protein denaturation and formation of insoluble polypeptides. Specific dry heat temperatures increased surface lipid and induced the formation of protein matrix and aggregation. Meal surface morphology rounded and flattened at specific dry heat temperatures, and smoothed with MHP. Differences in lipid-related functional groups were evident between dry heat temperatures, and with MHP. Treatment with MHP affected amide I and II, α-helix, β-sheet, their respective ratios and the total protein fingerprint region; fragmented meal into proteolysis-resistant protein aggregates with crevices containing lipid droplets; and, reduced solubility of canola meal polypeptides > 40 kDa. The changes observed may have a great effect on ruminal degradation and supply of protein and AA for ruminant utilisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".