MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2898957198 · doi:10.14740/wjnu359w

A Case of Myeloma Kidney With Glomerular C3 Deposition

2018· article· en· W2898957198 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Asif Khan, Khine Lam, Suzanne El‐Sayegh, Elie El‐Charabaty

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Nephrology and Urology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood urea nitrogenCreatinineInternal medicineMembranoproliferative glomerulonephritisGlomerulopathyNephropathyGastroenterologyRenal functionKidneyGlomerulonephritisPathologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C3 glomerulonephritis is rare form of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, which result from defects in complement regulatory proteins that promotes excessive activation of alternative complement pathway. Kidney disease is common complication of multiple myeloma (MM). Most common renal complications in MM include monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease and myeloma cast nephropathy. Moreover, monoclonal Ig, through the interference of the complement alternative pathway has been shown to play the synergistic role towards renal damage. Up to 50% of MM patients present with renal impairment at diagnosis, 20% may present with acute kidney injury, and 10% require dialysis. In this case report, we describe a case of MM with cast nephropathy with mesangial staining for C3 consistent with C3 glomerulopathy, and the interrelationship between MM and complement system that leads to C3 glomerulopathy. A 59-year-old Trinidadian man with a 2-year history of hypertension presented with nausea and vomiting associated with a generalized weakness for the past 3 months. On admission laboratory results were as follows: hemoglobin 9.1 g/dL; red blood count 1.45 × 10 6 /mm 3 ; white cell count 3.2 × 10 3 /mm 3 ; platelet count 94 × 10 3 /mm 3 ; blood urea nitrogen 94 mg/dL; serum creatinine 10.47 mg/dL (patient had a baseline creatinine level of 1.5 mg/dL); sodium 130 mEq/L; potassium 6.2 mEq/L; bicarbonate 14 mEq/L; total protein 7.0 g/dL; albumin 2.9 g/dL; alkaline phosphatase 57; AST and ALT normal; lipase 102 U/L; urine analysis showed 2+ protein with bland urine sediment and microscopic hematuria (3 - 6/HPF). 24-h urine protein was 2 g/day. Renal ultrasound was significant for a right renal 0.6 cm cyst. The patient was admitted to ICU and was subsequently hemodialyzed due to worsening hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury. Serologies were notable for positive anti-dsDNA antibody and low levels of C3 (46 mg/dL) with normal C4 were observed. Immunofixation by electrophoresis showed free lambda. Serum plasma electrophoresis showed two M-spikes: Lambda light chains and IgG Lambda. A renal biopsy was performed and cast nephropathy was identified with mesangial staining for C3. Bone marrow biopsy was performed and showed CD 56-positive plasma cell myeloma. Patient was treated with Velcade, Cytoxan, and dexamethasone. The patient was subsequently discharged on chemotherapy and intermittent hemodialysis therapy. Follow-up evaluation of the alternative complement pathway showed normal activity level. This case illustrated myeloma kidney associated with mesangial C3 deposition in glomeruli and C3 hypocomplementemia. Our hypothesis is that in monoclonal gammopathy induced C3 glomerulopathy; paraprotein itself is acting as a trigger that excessively activates and dysregulates the AC pathway systemically. Thus, it is highly feasible to tailor the treatment to reduce the amount of paraproteins in C3 glomerulopathy associated with myeloma kidney, as opposed to conventional treatment for C3 glomerulopathy such as plasma exchange, rituximab/eculizumab, etc. Recognizing of the association between C3 GN and MM is important because it can be used as potential marker for hematological malignancy as well as the potential effective treatment for C3 G associated MM. World J Nephrol Urol. 2018;7(3-4):73-77 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/wjnu359w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Nephrology and UrologySame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207