Time course and outcomes associated with transient versus persistent fibrinolytic phenotypes after injury: A nested, prospective, multicenter cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Temporal changes in fibrinolytic activity after injury and their impact on outcomes remain poorly defined. We conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study to determine the incidence of fibrinolytic phenotypes after injury and the trajectories and associated outcomes of these phenotypes over time. METHODS: We included adults that arrived within 6 hours of injury to three American Level I trauma centers. Clot lysis at 30 minutes (LY-30) was measured at presentation and at 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours, and 120 hours. LY-30 was used to categorize patients into the following fibrinolytic phenotypes: fibrinolysis shutdown (SD, LY-30 ≤0.8%), physiologic fibrinolysis (PHYS, LY-30 >0.8% to <3%), or hyperfibrinolysis (HF, LY-30 ≥3%). We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios for mortality. RESULTS: We included 795 adults (median age, 38 years; median Injury Severity Scale score, 21). In total, 44% presented with SD, 36% with PHYS, and 21% with HF. Mortality was highest among those who presented with HF (20%) followed by SD (10%) and PHYS (7%) (p = 0.001). While mortality within the first 24 hours was highest with admission HF (14% vs. 5% SD vs. 4% PHYS; p = 0.001), both admission HF (7%) and SD (6%) had higher mortality after 24 hours compared with PHYS (3%) (p = 0.04). All patients who presented with HF switched into another phenotype or died within 24 hours. The majority of patients that presented in SD remained in that phenotype, including 71% at 24 hours and 72% at 120 hours. Persistent SD at 24 hours was independently associated with increased mortality after 24 hours (odds ratio, 3.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-6.67). CONCLUSION: Approximately 70% of major trauma patients who present with SD remain in this phenotype up to 120 hours postinjury. In contrast, patients presenting with HF transition into another phenotype or die within 24 hours. While early mortality is highest with the HF phenotype, persistent SD at 24 hours is associated with elevated late mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological study, level II.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".