MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

UKRAINIAN ORAL SPEECH OF THE MODERN YOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN AND WESTERN ZONE: DEVIANT PROCESSES

2018· article· en· W2899116048 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
М. Л. Дружинець

Bibliographic record

VenueOpera in linguistica ukrainiana · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianLinguisticsPronunciationPhilologyGeographyHistoryPsychologySociologyGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the Ukrainian oral speech at the synchronic level, in particular to the spoken features of the Ukrainian language. The attempt to reveal, analyze and describe the deviations which appear as a result of violations of unstable pronouncing norms was made on the basis of a sociolinguistic survey. In particular whistling sounds before sibilants and vice versa, аlso the alveolar consonant [d] is considered before sibilants depending on the sphere of activity of the respondents and their living environment depending on the region of residence - South or Western Ukraine. In the comparative aspect, the pronunciation of the studied sound compositions by the youth of different countries (Ukraine, Canada, Moldova, Transnistrian) is presented.The subject of the research is using of the pronouncing norms of the modern Ukrainian language, in particular the sound combination (hushing sounds before sibilants, sibilants before hushing sounds and the transformation of coronal [d],[d'] in affricates before hushing sounds and sibilants).The sociolinguistic (social surveys), descriptive, comparative methods and the intake of quantitative calcculations through which the material was collected, recorded and analyzed are used in our research.The predecessors who studied certain issues (first of all, in social and phonetic description of Ukrainian speech) are N.I. Trots’kа, L.I. Prokopova, M.M. Fashchenko. The object of our research is the Ukrainian speech of the youth from Odesa, Kherson, Mykolayiv regions (students-philologists of the Ukrainian and Bulgarian branches of the Odessa National University named after I. Mechnikov) and Lviv, Ternopil, Ivano-Frankivsk regions (students-philologists of the Ukrainian department of the Lviv National University named after I. Franko). A survey was conducted among Ukrainian students of different courses and faculties of the Transnistrian State University named after T. Shevchenko (Tiraspol, Transdniestria), the Baltsky State University named after Oleka Russo (Moldova) and the youth of various spheres of Canada (Toronto) for comparison. Thus, speech errors allow to define the norm and the study of speech phenomena clearer. According to our observations the norms of pronunciation are closely related to the field of the youth: respondents-non-philologists double the number of mistakes in pronunciation than respondents-philologists. Modern youth of Southern Ukraine predominantly adhere to two laws of orthoepy - pronounced whistling before the sizzling and vice versa, but difficulties arise when pronounced [d] before whistling and sizzling. The last rule is a characteristic of the students-philologists specializing in Ukrainian language and literature, therefore, we treat it as unstable, often violated. In addition, on the basis of our research we were convinced that the unstable norms of the pronunciations of the sound compositions not reflected in the monuments of the XIX century, or occasionally certified. The modern youth of Western Ukraine, on the contrary, repelled better possession of the norms of pronunciation [d] before sizzling and whistling than the norms of pronunciation of whistling before sizzling and vice versa. In particular, orthoepic deviations were associated with the influence of spelling or stunning, which is characteristic of the southwestern dialect. And, of course, those rules of pronunciation of the sound compositions, which for a long time were recorded in the letters of the XIX century, are the most stable in verbal speech. The need for further research of the isolated problem is seen in the study of deviations that Ukrainian young people make when pronouncing consonant, vowel, and other sound combinations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpera in linguistica ukrainianaSame topicLinguistics, Language Diversity, and IdentityFrench-language works237,207