MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899131970 · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.003758

Expression of murine muscle-enriched A-type lamin-interacting protein (MLIP) is regulated by tissue-specific alternative transcription start sites

2018· article· en· W2899131970 on OpenAlexafffund
Marie‐Elodie Cattin, Shelley A. Deeke, Sarah A. Dick, Zachary J.A. Verret-Borsos, Gayashan Tennakoon, Rishi B. Gupta, Esther Mak, Cassandra Roeske, Jonathan J. Weldrick, Lynn A. Megeney, Patrick G. Burgon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsExonAlternative splicingBiologyRNA splicingGene isoformMolecular biologySkeletal muscleLaminGeneGene expressionCell biologyGeneticsRNAAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Muscle-enriched lamin-interacting protein (Mlip) is an alternatively spliced gene whose splicing specificity is dictated by tissue type. MLIP is most abundantly expressed in brain, cardiac, and skeletal muscle. In the present study, we systematically mapped the transcriptional start and stop sites of murine Mlip. Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) of Mlip transcripts from the brain, heart, and skeletal muscle revealed two transcriptional start sites (TSSs), exon 1a and exon 1b, and only one transcriptional termination site. RT-PCR analysis of the usage of the two identified TSSs revealed that the heart utilizes only exon 1a for MLIP expression, whereas the brain exclusively uses exon 1b TSS. Loss of Mlip exon 1a in mice resulted in a 7-fold increase in the prevalence of centralized nuclei in muscle fibers with the Mlip exon1a–deficient satellite cells on single fibers exhibiting a significant delay in commitment to a MYOD-positive phenotype. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the A-type lamin-binding domain in MLIP is encoded in exon 1a, indicating that MLIP isoforms generated with exon 1b TSS lack the A-type lamin-binding domain. Collectively these findings suggest that Mlip tissue-specific expression and alternative splicing play a critical role in determining MLIP’s functions in mice. Muscle-enriched lamin-interacting protein (Mlip) is an alternatively spliced gene whose splicing specificity is dictated by tissue type. MLIP is most abundantly expressed in brain, cardiac, and skeletal muscle. In the present study, we systematically mapped the transcriptional start and stop sites of murine Mlip. Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) of Mlip transcripts from the brain, heart, and skeletal muscle revealed two transcriptional start sites (TSSs), exon 1a and exon 1b, and only one transcriptional termination site. RT-PCR analysis of the usage of the two identified TSSs revealed that the heart utilizes only exon 1a for MLIP expression, whereas the brain exclusively uses exon 1b TSS. Loss of Mlip exon 1a in mice resulted in a 7-fold increase in the prevalence of centralized nuclei in muscle fibers with the Mlip exon1a–deficient satellite cells on single fibers exhibiting a significant delay in commitment to a MYOD-positive phenotype. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the A-type lamin-binding domain in MLIP is encoded in exon 1a, indicating that MLIP isoforms generated with exon 1b TSS lack the A-type lamin-binding domain. Collectively these findings suggest that Mlip tissue-specific expression and alternative splicing play a critical role in determining MLIP’s functions in mice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207