Light exposure during embryonic and yolk‐sac alevin development of Chinook salmon <i>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</i> does not alter the spectral phenotype of photoreceptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colour vision is mediated by the expression of different visual pigments in photoreceptors of the vertebrate retina. Each visual pigment is a complex of a protein (opsin) and a vitamin A chromophore; alterations to either component affects visual pigment absorbance and, potentially, the visual capabilities of an animal. Many species of fish undergo changes in opsin expression during retinal development. In the case of salmonid fishes the single cone photoreceptors undergo a switch in opsin expression from SWS1 (ultraviolet sensitive) to SWS2 (blue-light sensitive) starting at the yolk-sac alevin stage, around the time when they first experience light. Whether light may initiate this event or produce a plastic response in the various photoreceptors is unknown. In this study, Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha were exposed to light from the embryonic (5 days prior to hatching) into the yolk sac alevin (25 days post hatching) stage and the spectral phenotype of photoreceptors assessed with respect to that of unexposed controls by in situ hybridization with opsin riboprobes. Light exposure did not change the spectral phenotype of photoreceptors, their overall morphology or spatial arrangement. These results concur with those from a variety of fish species and suggest that plasticity in photoreceptor spectral phenotype via changes in opsin expression may not be a widespread occurrence among teleosts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".