MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899244009 · doi:10.3126/ajms.v9i6.20497

The digital epidemiology of phenylketonuria, aka folling’s disease: retrospective analysis and geographic mapping via google trends

2018· article· en· W2899244009 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Al-Imam

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Medical Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Occupational Therapists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpidemiologyMedicinePhenylketonuriasPathologyGeneticsBiologyPhenylalanine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Phenylketonuria, commonly known as PKU, is an inherited disorder in which there is an abnormally elevated blood level of the amino acid phenylalanine leading to several pathologies affecting multiple organs including the central nervous system and resulting in debilitating intellectual disability and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Phenylalanine is a building block of several critical proteins within the biological systems.Aims and Objective: To assess the digital epidemiology and geographic mapping of Phenylketonuria.Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective analytic (2013‑2017) of a very large database existing on the surface web known as Google Trends. it aims to extrapolate a statistical inference concerning the digital epidemiology and the geographic mapping of phenylketonuria. The trends database will be explored via thematic keywords specific to the condition of phenylketonuria including “Phenylketonuria [PKU]”, “Phenylalanine”, “Inborn errors of metabolism”, “Tetrahydrobiopterin”, and “Chromosome 12 (human)”.Results: The digital epidemiology is densely clustered in countries from the developed world, eastern Europe, and Latin America. Surface web users from China appears to possess the highest interest in phenylketonuria. The contribution of the Middle Eastern and Arabic countries to the geographic mapping did not exceed 10.51% at its best. Significant changes existed for year-to-year variations of trends. Statistical outliers were also found, the strongest of which was observed during April 2016 for which there’s no plausible explanation.Conclusion: Trends databases operating on the surface web represent potent tools of big data that can be exploited to assess the digital epidemiology and geographic mapping of countless phenomenon including rare genetic diseases and inborn errors of metabolism. There are also enormous potentials for real-time and predictive analytics of these databases when investing the application of automation in data collection and principles of machine learning.Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.9(6) 2018 93-99

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Journal of Medical SciencesSame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207