A model for porosity evolution in shale reservoirs: An example from the Upper Devonian Duvernay Formation, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The influence of thermal maturity on porosity in shale samples from the Upper Devonian Duvernay Formation is examined. The samples span a maturity range from immature to the wet gas window. Porosity decreases from immature to the oil window, primarily because of compaction. Relatively high porosity of wet gas window samples is ascribed to formation of secondary organic pores, feldspar dissolution pores, and primary pore preservation by the quartz framework. The final decline in the porosity of the dry gas window samples is explained by greater compaction, the disappearance of secondary organic pores, and feldspar dissolution pores. Porosity correlates positively to quartz content and negatively to carbonate content; no relationship was evident between porosity and clay or total organic carbon content. No obvious correlations exist between rock composition and permeability except that SiO2 content shows a weakly positive correlation to permeability. Permeability is highest in immature samples, which have the greatest pore and pore-throat sizes. Nitrogen adsorption and mercury injection analysis show that pore and pore-throat sizes decrease with increasing maturity. Visible pores, imaged by scanning electron microscopy and helium ion microscopy, exist as organic pores, including bubblelike pores developed within organic matter (OM) and fissure-type pores, intraparticle pores mainly developed within carbonate grains, and interparticle pores either within a clay-rich matrix or between rigid mineral grains. In immature samples, the primary pores are interparticle pores between clay minerals and other mineral grains. The OM fissures are ubiquitous in oil window samples, and secondary bubblelike OM–hosted pores are well developed within gas window samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it