The Archpriest of Hita's “Dueñas Chicas” and the Mulierculas of Latin Preachers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este ensayo pretende demostrar cómo las “dueñas chicas” del Libro de buen amor (manuscrito S, coplas 1606-1617) pueden relacionarse con las mujercillas o mulierculas (es decir, la forma plural, diminutiva y a menudo despectiva de mulier en latín) que se critican como pecadoras en la Segunda Epístola de San Pablo a Timoteo (3.6), según la Vulgata. Existe una larga tradición de comentarios, y sobre todo sermones medievales - entre otras obras devotas y moralizantes - que citan este pasaje bíblico con el propósito de menospreciar a algunas mujeres que se consideran pecaminosas y que, por tanto, adquieren el título de mulierculas. Las acusan de entregarse a hombres hipócritas que llegan a seducirlas y corromperlas bajo pretextos religiosos. El Arcipreste de Hita parece aludir irónicamente a esta tradición cuando se dirige al público (“Quiero vos abreviar, señores, la predicaçion”) para elogiar a las “dueñas chicas,” la “muger chica,” “pequeña” y “pequeñuela.” De esta manera, el narrador parodia el texto de San Pablocomo fuente de predicación, transformando el menosprecio de los predicadores en una celebración de las cualidades superiores de las mulierculas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".