MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899385622 · doi:10.1115/1.4041851

A Lyapunov Stable Controller for Bilateral Haptic Teleoperation of Single-Rod Hydraulic Actuators Subjected to Base Disturbance

2018· article· en· W2899385622 on OpenAlexafffund
Vikram Banthia, Ali Maddahi, Kourosh Zareinia, Subramaniam Balakrishnan, Nariman Sepehri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTeleoperationControl theory (sociology)ActuatorHaptic technologyController (irrigation)Lyapunov functionLyapunov stabilityStability (learning theory)Hydraulic cylinderControl engineeringBase (topology)Computer scienceEngineeringSimulationRobotControl (management)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceNonlinear systemMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a control scheme is developed and evaluated for stable bilateral haptic teleoperation of a single-rod hydraulic actuator subjected to base disturbance. The proposed controller, based on Lyapunov stability technique, is capable of reducing position errors at master and slave sides, and provides a feel of the contact force between the actuator and the task environment to the operator without a need for direct measurement. The controller requires only the measurements of the actuator line pressures and displacements of the master and slave. The system stability is insensitive to the uncertainties of the physical parameters and of the measurement of the base point motion. Stability of the proposed controller incorporating hydraulic nonlinearities and operator dynamics with an estimated upper value for the base disturbance is analytically proven. Simulation studies validate that the proposed control system is stable while interacting with a task environment. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of control scheme in maintaining stability, while having good position tracking by the hydraulic actuator as well as providing a haptic feel to the operator without direct measurement of interaction force, while the hydraulic actuator is subjected to base disturbance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and ControlSame topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207