MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899492695 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00322.2018

Ventilatory and sensory responses to incremental exercise in adults with a Fontan circulation

2018· article· en· W2899492695 on OpenAlex
Jordan A. Guenette, Andrew H. Ramsook, Satvir S. Dhillon, Joseph H. Puyat, M. Riahi, Alexander R. Opotowsky, Jasmine Grewal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaProvidence Health Care Research InstituteProvidence Health Care
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsCirculation (fluid dynamics)Sensory systemPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineCardiologyInternal medicinePsychologyCognitive psychologyMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many adults with single-ventricle congenital heart disease who have undergone a Fontan procedure have abnormal pulmonary function resembling restrictive lung disease. Whether this contributes to ventilatory limitations and increased dyspnea has not been comprehensively studied. We recruited 17 Fontan participants and 17 healthy age- and sex-matched sedentary controls. All participants underwent complete pulmonary function testing followed by a symptom-limited incremental cardiopulmonary cycle exercise test with detailed assessments of dyspnea and operating lung volumes. Fontan participants and controls were well matched for age, sex, body mass index, height, and self-reported physical activity levels (all P > 0.05), although Fontan participants had markedly reduced cardiorespiratory fitness and peak work rates ( P < 0.001). Fontan participants had lower values for most pulmonary function measurements relative to controls with 65% of Fontan participants showing evidence of a restrictive ventilatory defect. Relative to controls, Fontan participants had significantly higher breathing frequency, end-inspiratory lung volume (% total lung capacity), ventilatory inefficiency (high ventilatory equivalent for CO 2 ), and dyspnea intensity ratings at standardized absolute submaximal work rates. There were no between-group differences in qualitative descriptors of dyspnea. The restrictive ventilatory defect in Fontan participants likely contributes to their increased breathing frequency and end-inspiratory lung volume during exercise. This abnormal ventilatory response coupled with greater ventilatory inefficiency may explain the increased dyspnea intensity ratings in those with a Fontan circulation. Interventions that enhance the ventilatory response to exercise in Fontan patients may help optimize exercise rehabilitation interventions, resulting in improved exercise tolerance and exertional symptoms. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to comprehensively characterize both ventilatory and sensory responses to exercise in adults that have undergone the Fontan procedure. The majority of Fontan participants had a restrictive ventilatory defect. Compared with well-matched controls, Fontan participants had increased breathing frequency, end-inspiratory lung volume, and ventilatory inefficiency. These abnormal ventilatory responses likely form the mechanistic basis for the increased dyspnea intensity ratings observed in our Fontan participants during exercise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it