MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2899525399 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noy148.1045

SURG-09. AWAKE CRANIOTOMY FOR BRAIN TUMOR IN OCTOGENARIANS AND NONAGENARIANS

2018· article· en· W2899525399 on OpenAlexaffabout
John Sinclair, Tomasz Z. Polis, Janna Malone, Gregory Krolczyk, Reva Ramlogan

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePropofolRemifentanilSurgeryCraniotomyInstitutional review boardAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Awake craniotomy allows for maximal tumor resection while improving survival and preserving functional status. This procedure is well tolerated in the elderly population (age 65–80). We report the Ottawa Hospital experience with patients 80 years old. A chart review (research ethics board approved) of awake craniotomies performed between July 2009 and February 2018 was completed. 14 patients 80 years old at the time of surgery were identified, with ages ranging from 80–93, averaging 83 ± 3.6 years old. Preoperatively, 12 patients had Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) 80, 2 patients KPS 70. 8 tumors were frontal, 4 temporal, and 2 parietal. Average tumor volume was 23.9 ± 17.9 ml. Pathologies revealed 8 high grade gliomas, 4 metastatic lesions, 1 atypical meningioma and 1 case of radiation necrosis. Intraoperative functional mapping was successful in all the cases. Neuroanesthesiologists followed the protocol involving continuous infusion of low-ultra low dose of propofol, remifentanil and ketamine. Surgical time was 335 ± 84 min. Gross total resection was achieved in 8 patients; near total resection in 6 patients as confirmed by postoperative MRI. Ten patients (62%) had very good outcome with improvement or similar, as before surgery functional status at the time of discharge home, which averaged 4.7 ± 2 days post-operatively. Four patients (38%) had prolonged hospital stay of 37 ± 37 days post-operatively. Two of those patients had low KPS pre and post-operatively. The other two patients had transient increase in neurological deficit postoperatively requiring hospitalization. After initial improvement their functional status deteriorated post radiation therapy, which was started 1 month after surgery. There was no mortality over 30 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians and nonagenarians tolerate surgery well following Ottawa Awake Craniotomy Protocol, especially when their preoperative functional status is good. Early good postoperative outcomes may be affected by their ensuing radiation therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicMeningioma and schwannoma management→French-language works237,207→