MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899564587 · doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000738

ACPA and RF as predictors of sustained clinical remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Ontario Best practices Research Initiative (OBRI)

2018· article· en· W2899564587 on OpenAlex
Janet Pope, Mohammad Movahedi, Emmanouil Rampakakis, Angela Cesta, John S. Sampalis, Edward Keystone, Carter Thorne, Claire Bombardier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRMD Open · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsSouthlake Regional Health CenterMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoSt Joseph's Health CareUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalMcGill UniversityWestern University
FundersCanadian Arthritis NetworkOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareCelgeneSanofiAmgenPfizerEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisInternal medicinePhysical therapyArthritisAlternative medicineFamily medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective(s) This study evaluated the interaction of anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) in predicting sustained clinical response in an observational registry of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) followed in routine practice. Methods Patients with RA enrolled in the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative registry, with ≥1 swollen joint, autoantibody information and ≥1 follow-up assessment were included. Sustained clinical remission was defined as Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤2.8 in at least two sequential visits separated by 3–12 months. Time to sustained remission was assessed using cumulative incidence curves and multivariate cox regression. Results Among 3251 patients in the registry, 970 were included, of whom 262 (27%) were ACPA neg /RF neg , 60 (6.2%) ACPA pos /RF neg , 117 (12.1%) ACPA neg /RF pos and 531 (54.7%) ACPA pos /RF pos at baseline. Significant between group differences were observed in age (p=0.02), CDAI (p=0.03), tender joint count (p=0.02) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (p=0.002), with ACPA pos patients being youngest with lowest disease activity and disability. No difference in biologic use was found between groups (20.2% of patients). Over a mean follow-up of 3 years, sustained remission was achieved by 43.5% of ACPA pos /RF pos patients, 43.3% of ACPA pos /RF neg patients, 31.6 % of ACPA neg /RF pos patients and 32.4% of ACPA neg /RF neg patients (p=0.01). Significant differences were observed in CDAI improvement based on ACPA and RF status where ACPA pos /RF pos had a shorter time to achieving sustained remission (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.67) and experienced significantly higher improvements compared with ACPA neg /RF neg patients. Conclusion(s) Combined ACPA and RF positivity were associated with improved and faster response to antirheumatic medications in patients with RA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it