Écfrasis y enargaeia en "Las musas inquietantes" de Cristina Peri Rossi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El proposito de este ensayo es examinar esta relacion dinamica entre la creacion y la lectura en el contexto de Las musas inquietantes de Cristina Peri Rossi. Este libro esta constituido por una coleccion de poemas que se basan en obras pictoricas. En primer lugar, se analizara uno de los temas destacados en el poemario: la reflexion dialectica que puede ser leida como una metafora del acto de crear y el acto de leer. Con las numerosas imagenes de ventanas, espejos y miradas en sus poemas, Peri Rossi llama la atencion del lector sobre la mirada reciproca entre el espectador y el creador. A continuacion, se discutira la ecfrasis que ocurre en estos poemas como una especie de teatro, en el sentido de una serie de senales visuales puestas en accion a traves de su interaccion con una serie de senales verbales. Finalmente, se discutira el significado de este tipo de ecfrasis con respecto a otros temas que se exploran en este poemario, a saber, la formacion del canon literario y artistico asi como el rol de la critica de arte en la construccion de este canon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".