MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899665508

Écfrasis y enargaeia en "Las musas inquietantes" de Cristina Peri Rossi

2010· article· es· W2899665508 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCÉFIRO: ENLACE HISPANO CULTURAL Y LITERARIO · 2010
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterary and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El proposito de este ensayo es examinar esta relacion dinamica entre la creacion y la lectura en el contexto de Las musas inquietantes de Cristina Peri Rossi. Este libro esta constituido por una coleccion de poemas que se basan en obras pictoricas. En primer lugar, se analizara uno de los temas destacados en el poemario: la reflexion dialectica que puede ser leida como una metafora del acto de crear y el acto de leer. Con las numerosas imagenes de ventanas, espejos y miradas en sus poemas, Peri Rossi llama la atencion del lector sobre la mirada reciproca entre el espectador y el creador. A continuacion, se discutira la ecfrasis que ocurre en estos poemas como una especie de teatro, en el sentido de una serie de senales visuales puestas en accion a traves de su interaccion con una serie de senales verbales. Finalmente, se discutira el significado de este tipo de ecfrasis con respecto a otros temas que se exploran en este poemario, a saber, la formacion del canon literario y artistico asi como el rol de la critica de arte en la construccion de este canon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it