MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899678649 · doi:10.1093/geroni/igy023.2787

INTRAINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY APPROACHES TO COGNITIVE HEALTH AND AGING: CLINICAL, NEURAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL LINKS

2018· article· en· W2899678649 on OpenAlexaff
Robert S. Stawski, Stuart MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovation in Aging · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialCognitionPsychologyNeuropsychologyCognitive neuropsychologyCognitive psychologyDevelopmental psychologyNeurocognitiveClinical psychologyAffect (linguistics)Cognitive neuroscienceClinical neuropsychologyNeurosciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growing consensus from various scientific disciplines including lifespan psychology, cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology, and mathematical modeling suggests that theoretically interesting aspects of cognitive function are not sufficiently captured by mean performance – a fact that reflects a critical oversimplification of behavior patterns that may hinder an improved understanding of correlates and mechanisms of age-related cognitive health. The focus of this symposium concerns exploring novel applications of intraindividual variability approaches for further informing predictors and processes underlying age-related cognitive health from several understudied vantages: psychosocial correlates, neural variability, and clinical applicability. Cerino will examine time-varying and individual differences variation in positive and negative affect as psychosocial correlates of response time inconsistency (RTI), an indicator of mental noise and central nervous system integrity. Lukyn will systematically explore the potential clinical applicability of both mean and variability estimates of gait from a computerized walkway. By developing norms, they explore whether distribution-based assumptions of standardized assessment are applicable to RT-based variability scores for detecting those at risk of cognitive impairment. Finally, Halliday will explore what variability in neural process and neuropsychological function can tell us about age-related cognitive health. Preliminary findings show that brain variability, derived from the hemodynamic response of a functional near infrared spectroscopy assessment, are related to cognitive function in general and to fall risk in particular. In summation, MacDonald and Stawski will cohesively integrate these findings, outlining exciting new directions for employing an intraindividual variability approach to elucidate correlates and mechanisms of age-related cognitive health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovation in AgingSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207