MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 14938: Association Between Survival and Increases in Prehospital Systolic Blood Pressure After Its Nadir in Major Traumatic Brain Injury

2015· article· en· W2899774731 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel W. Spaite, Chengcheng Hu, Bentley J. Bobrow, Duane L. Sherrill, Vatsal Chikani, Bruce Barnhart, Joshua B. Gaither, Kurt R. Denninghoff, P. David Adelson, Chad Viscusi, Terry Mullins, Uwe Stolz

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsBentley (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTraumatic brain injuryBlood pressureNadirCardiologyInternal medicineEmergency medicineAnesthesiaPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Little is known about prehospital EMS blood pressure patterns in TBI and the effect of serial trends in BP during EMS care remains entirely unclear. Using the comprehensive, linked EMS data in the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) TBI Study (NIH 1R01NS071049; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01339702), we evaluated the association between mortality and increases in EMS systolic BP (SBP) after the lowest recorded SBP in major TBI cases. Methods: We used the entire EPIC pre-implementation cohort (before TBI guideline implementation; 1/07-3/14) to assess, in detail, a previous preliminary evaluation. All moderate/severe TBI cases (CDC Barell Matrix Type 1) were evaluated [exclusions: age <10, died before ED arrival, SBP <40 or >300, missing SBP (4%)]. Logistic regression was used to determine associations between increases in EMS SBP after the lowest SBP and the probability of death, adjusted for important confounders. Results: Among 14,567 included cases, 7696 (68% male, median age 45) were in the cohort of interest (had an equal or higher SBP recorded subsequent to the lowest). Figures show the probability of death vs the increase after the nadir (and 95% CIs) in 4 cohorts of lowest SBP (40-89; 90-139; 140-159; 160-300). Conclusion: Increases in EMS SBP after the nadir revealed distinct patterns: Hypotension-Mortality drops significantly if SBP increases after the nadir (dramatic improvement with large increases). Normotension-Mortality is slightly reduced with SBP increases and even large increases were not detrimental. Mild HTN-Mortality decreases with modest SBP increases but large increases (>40mmHg) are associated with higher mortality. Severe HTN-Higher mortality with any subsequent increase. The findings in the hypotensive & normotensive cohorts support the concept of restoring/optimizing cerebral perfusion in TBI. This is further supported by the fact that, even with mild HTN, moderate SBP increases do not appear to be detrimental.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→