AGING, BODY PRACTICES, GENDERED SUBJECTIVITY AND LATER LIFE IDENTITIES: NARRATIVES FROM INDIA AND CANADA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The consumerist movement around medicalization of bodies and anti-aging technologies is re-defining how one grows old in today’s societies. With the popularity of the “successful” and “active” aging paradigms, the socio-political expectations around growing old in industrialized societies, have shifted from the natural process of decline to a more preventive, medically focused process enhancing physical and cognitive plasticity. Parallel to this narrative of overzealous popular culture of fit, healthy and successful aging, growing old in India is often characterized by dependence, illness, withdrawal from the material world and gradual recourse to religion and spirituality. This study offers a critique of the “successful’’ and “positive” aging paradigms, and asserts that these parallels have gendered implications on identity, self-representation and citizenship of aging women (and men) in both the societies. Based on qualitative interviews of 45 older adults (aged above 54 years) of Indian origin, this study engages in a cross-national comparison of narrative accounts of everyday body practices, perceptions and lived experiences of growing old in two urban settings in India (Ahmedabad) and Canada (Vancouver). In the process, this study also analyzes the influence of migration and acculturation on aging bodies, and examines how the older adults, particularly older females, navigate the socio-cultural shift in their efforts to maintain personal continuity, identity and selfhood through everyday practices. Further, drawing from cultural gerontological understanding, this study reflects on how the neoliberal movements of consumerism, healthism and body/beauty practices are changing older adult’s negotiations with intimate relationships, family, peer networks, religion, and death.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".