MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899817298 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noy148.681

PATH-25. SURVIVAL STRATIFICATION OF IDH MUTANT GLIOMA USING METHYLATION AND mRNA ANALYSIS OF HOX GENES

2018· article· en· W2899817298 on OpenAlexaff
Yasin Mamatjan, Severa Bunda, Fábio Ynoe de Moraes, Suganth Suppiah, Pardeep Heir, Abulizi Maimaitiming, Gelareh Zadeh, Kenneth Aldape

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Quality and Safety Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Western HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHox geneBiologyMethylationGliomaGeneHazard ratioCancer researchGeneticsMolecular biologyOncologyGene expressionInternal medicineMedicineConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diffuse gliomas are separated based on IDH mutation (mut) status. However, IDH-mut gliomas manifest wide range of clinical outcome that are not explained by the current genomic classification. We aim to identify clinically and biologically relevant subgroups within IDH-mut low grade gliomas to gain a deeper insight and improve classification. We used 412 IDH-mut gliomas profiled by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Network, utilising methylation, mRNA and mutation datasets to identify unique molecular signatures. We found that IDH-mut gliomas further subdivide into 2 groups based on mutational rate. High mutation load predicts poor survival in IDH-mut glioma. Analysis of differentially expressed genes in high versus low-mutational rate showed significant enrichment of HOX genes, 24/40 HOX genes were up regulated in this group. Interestingly, both overexpression and hyper-methylation of specific HOX genes were associated with worse survival. We further show that 7 of these HOX genes (HOXA4, HOXA7, HOXA10, HOXA13, HOXD3, HOXD9, and HOXD10) are the most significant in determining survival. Signed average of 7 Hox genes significantly improved survival and hazard ratio (HR) based on high versus low methylation (HR=4.3, p<0.0001) and high versus low mRNA expression (HR=2.8, p=0.00095). Similarly, effect on survival based on high expression and hyper-methylation of HOX genes was not only observed in IDH-mut 1p/19q-codeleted and non-codeleted groups independently, but also in IDH-wild-type low grade glioma. Multivariate analysis adjusted for confounding factors (grade, age and codeletion status) showed prognostic factors associated with survival in high versus low methylated group (HR=3.2, p=0.0036). Interestingly, only the same direction (high-high and low-low groups) of both mRNA and methylation showed significance and increased HR, which challenges the current understanding of methylation of genes and gene expression. We show that IDH-mut gliomas can further be stratified into clinically relevant categories based on high mRNA expression and hyper-methylation of Hox genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicFood Quality and Safety StudiesFrench-language works237,207