Reduction of Acquisition time using Partition of the sIgnal Decay in Spectroscopic Imaging technique (RAPID-SI)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To overcome long acquisition times of Chemical Shift Imaging (CSI), a new Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI) technique called Reduction of Acquisition time by Partition of the sIgnal Decay in Spectroscopic Imaging (RAPID-SI) using blipped phase encoding gradients inserted during signal acquisition was developed. To validate the results using RAPID-SI and to demonstrate its usefulness in terms of acquisition time and data quantification; simulations, phantom and in vivo studies were conducted, and the results were compared to standard CSI. The method was based upon the partition of a magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) signal into sequential sub-signals encoded using blipped phase encoding gradients inserted during signal acquisition at a constant time interval. The RAPID-SI technique was implemented on a clinical 3 T Siemens scanner to demonstrate its clinical utility. Acceleration of data collection was performed by inserting R (R = acceleration factor) blipped gradients along a given spatial direction during data acquisition. Compared to CSI, RAPID-SI reduced acquisition time by the acceleration factor R. For example, a 2D 16x16 data set acquired in about 17 min with CSI, was reduced to approximately 2 min with the RAPID-SI (R = 8). While the SNR of the acquired RAPID-SI signal was lower compared to CSI by approximately the factor √R, it can be improved after data pre-processing and reconstruction. Compared to CSI, RAPID-SI reduces acquisition time, while preserving metabolites information. Furthermore, the method is flexible and could be combined with other acceleration methods such as Parallel Imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".