MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 11571: Beneficial Effect of Early Infusion of Landiolol; A Very Short Acting Beta1 Adrenergic Receptor Blocker, on Reperfusion Status in Acute Myocardial Infarction

2016· article· en· W2900059288 on OpenAlexaff
Masayoshi Kiyokuni, Tabito Kino, Minako Kagimoto, Nao Yamada, Kiwamu Iwata, Naoki Nakayama, Keiko Takano, Naohiro Komura, Manabu Nitta, Teruyasu Sugano, Tsutomu Endo, Tomoaki Ishigami, Toshiyuki Ishikawa, Kazuo Kimura

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsElectrovaya (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial infarctionCardiologyAdrenergic receptorInternal medicineAdrenergicAnesthesiaReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Landiolol is the beta-1 selective receptor blocker and its half-life elimination is 4 minutes. The safety and efficacy of landiolol started before coronary reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) remains unclear. We assessed the hypothesis that very early use of landiolol promotes optimal reperfusion without increasing adverse events for those patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-group trial of landiolol during the pPCI for a STEMI. Landiolol was started intravenously just before the pPCI with 3 μg/kg/min. The reperfusion status and clinical outcomes in 55 treated patients were compared with those in 60 historical control patients treated without landiolol. The optimal reperfusion was assessed by an ST-segment resolution (STR), coronary flow, myocardial brush grade (MBG) and peak creatine kinase (CK) after reperfusion. Result: Time from admission to starting landiolol was 35±23min in landiolol group. Age, sex, coronary risk factors, culprit lesion, SYNTAX score and reperfusion time did not differ between landiolol group and control group (all NS). Those in the landiolol group achieved a higher rate of an STR (64% vs. 42%, p =0.023) and MBG 2/3 (64% vs. 45%, p =0.045), whereas coronary flow and peak CK were comparable between the two groups. A multivariate analysis showed that landiolol use was an independent predictor of an STR (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.25-7.16, p =0.014). The incidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (27% vs. 50%, p =0.014), hypotension (15% vs. 32%, p =0.046) and progression to Killip class grade III or IV (0% vs. 10%, p =0.028) during admission were lower in the landiolol group. Within 12 months after the admission, the rate of worsening heart failure (0vs7%, p=0.07) tended to be lower in landiolol group. Left ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume index in 12 months after the admission did not differ between the two groups (landiolol group vs control group: 59±11%vs56±15%, p=0.23; 60±14vs63±30ml/m 2 , p=0.62). Conclusion: In patients with STEMI, intra-procedural landiolol in pPCI may attenuate myocardial reperfusion injury and reduce adverse events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207