MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900063288 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofy210.860

1023. A Controlled-Release Prescription Oral Opioid Can Prolong S. aureus Survival in Injection Drug Preparation Equipment and Potentially Increase Bacteremia Risk

2018· article· en· W2900063288 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katherine J. Kasper, Iswarya Manoharan, Dresden Glockler-Lauf, Laura Ball, Brian Hallam, Sharon Koivu, John K. McCormick, Michael Silverman

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePopulationStaphylococcus aureusBacteremiaOpiateDrugSyringePharmacologyMicrobiologyAntibioticsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background S. aureus is the most common pathogen associated with injection drug use-associated endocarditis (IDUaIE). Our center has a high incidence of IDUaIE and the opiate of choice in our population is hydromorphone-controlled release (HCR), a prescribed oral opiate widely used in Canada and Europe. The complex technique for preparation for injection provides multiple opportunities for contamination of the solution and the controlled-release preparation contains several excipients (carbohydrates, protein, and iron), which could enhance Staphylococcal survival. A large amount of drug remains in the injection drug preparation equipment (IDPE) after each use and therefore, used IDPE is saved by people who inject drugs (PWID) for subsequent reuse by adding more water and then injecting the solution intravenously. Methods Used IDPE was collected from active PWID, rinsed with sterile water, aspirated into a syringe in a technique which mimicked reuse of equipment by PWID, and then plated on Mannitol salt agar (MSA). Bacterial isolates from local bacteremic PWID were used to test the survival of S. aureus (MRSA and MSSA) and S. pyogenes on unused IDPE with HCR or hydromorphone immediate release (HIR). The solutions were aspirated using techniques similar to that of local PWID and then plated on MSA and Blood agar. Results A total of 109 used IDPE samples were collected between March 2017 and March 2018. S. aureus was detected in 15/94 (16%) IDPE samples that had been used for injection of HMC (seven MRSA, seven MSSA, and two borderline resistant [one sample contained both MRSA and MSSA]), but 0/15 (0%) samples used for hydromorphone immediate release (HIR). HCR, but not HM, was associated with greater survival of MSSA and MRSA (but not S. pyogenes) in solutions of the drug when compared with sterile water vehicle control (Figure 1). There was a 2-log reduction in the number of viable S. aureus when IDPE containing HCR solutions spiked with MRSA or MSSA were heated with a cigarette lighter until bubbling (<10 seconds). Conclusion IDPE that has been used in the preparation of HCR is frequently contaminated with S. aureus; and in vitro HCR, but not HM, prolongs the survival of MRSA and MSSA. Heating IDPE may be an effective harm-reduction strategy to reduce bacterial complications of injection of HCR. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207