MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900104575

MEMBRANA DE LÁTEX NA RECONSTRUÇÃO DE AVULSÃO DE TENDÃO PRÉ-PÚBICO EM UM CÃO - RELATO DE CASO

2018· article· pt· W2900104575 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bruna Ros Soares, Guilherme Kanciukaitis Tognoli, Marina Gabriela Monteiro Carvalho Mori da Cunha, Alceu Gaspar Raiser

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldChemistry
TopicPlant-Derived Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecologySurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A membrana de latex e um biomaterial com propriedades angiogenicas que aceleram a reparacao tecidual. Descreve-se o caso de uma cadela, Labrador, com avulsao de tendao pre-pubico por atropelamento. A paciente fora submetida a celiotomia exploratoria em outro estabelecimento e entao trazida para segunda avaliacao, em que foi detectada a ruptura. Apos confirmacao da estabilidade cardiorrespiratoria, o animal foi anestesiado e realizada lavagem da ferida com iodo topico 1% diluido em cloreto de sodio 0,9% (1:1000). Apos obtencao do plano anestesico e anti-sepsia, realizou-se incisao eliptica ao redor da ferida da celiotomia e foi retirada uma faixa de pele pois a ferida encontrava-se com aspecto inflamatorio. Apos a exerese, adentrou-se a cavidade abdominal e o musculo reto abdominal (MRA) foi identificado. As lesoes peritoneais e mesentericas foram suturadas com pontos simples continuo com fio de poliglactina 910 3-0. Foram realizadas perfuracoes no pube para ancorar a sutura do tendao do MRA com fio de nailon 1, no entanto nao obteve-se o fechamento total da cavidade, assim, optou-se pela implantacao da membrana de latex in natura nao centrifugada a qual foi moldada e fixada com fios de nailon 2-0 com sutura simples interrompida. A paciente retornou aos 10 dias para a remocao dos pontos e depois aos 30 dias para reavaliacao em que se constatou que nao havia eventracao o que permite concluir que a curto prazo a membrana foi eficiente mas que estudos adicionais sao necessarios acerca da biocompatibilidade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant-Derived Bioactive CompoundsFrench-language works237,207