MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development and Evaluation of the Breast Cancer Online Rehabilitation (BRECOR) Program for Self-managed Upper-Body Rehabilitation for Women With Breast Cancer

2018· article· en· W2900109579 on OpenAlexaff
Bolette Skjødt Rafn, Carina Nees, Julie Midtgaard, Pat G. Camp, Jette Vibe-Petersen, Kristin L. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueRehabilitation Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationBreast cancerMedicinePhysical therapyUpper bodyCancerPhysical fitness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Survivors of breast cancer experience upper-body issues. Objectives: To develop and evaluate a rehabilitation program (BRECOR) to support self-managed upper-body rehabilitation after treatment for breast cancer. Design: Development and feasibility study. Setting: Community-based. Participants: Development of program elements (clinical assessment tool, education pamphlet, and Website) was informed by 17 physical therapists with experience in oncology rehabilitation and 10 women with breast cancer. Feasibility was evaluated by 35 women who had recently undergone surgery for breast cancer and 29 women who had completed surgery and radiation therapy for breast cancer. Intervention: Participants performed an individualized 12-week self-managed upper-body rehabilitation program informed by the clinical assessment tool, with support from the education pamphlet and the Website. Measurements: Recruitment/retention rates, adherence, capacity, and participant satisfaction were collected to establish feasibility. Results: Feedback from the physical therapists was instrumental in developing the program content. User testing refined the program elements. Participant feedback in the feasibility testing was positive with good recruitment (80%), retention (83%), and adherence (72%) to the self-managed upper-body rehabilitation program. Participants improved their upper-body function and reported benefit from the program. Limitations: The effectiveness of the BRECOR program in improving upper-body function cannot be determined, as this was a single-group feasibility study. Conclusion: A feasible, self-managed upper-body rehabilitation program was developed through iterative stages of program development and feasibility testing. The BRECOR program elements provide a toolkit to enforce qualified upper-body assessment, provide rehabilitation prescriptions, and support self-managed upper-body rehabilitation after treatment for breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRehabilitation OncologySame topicCancer survivorship and careFrench-language works237,207