MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development and Evaluation of the Breast Cancer Online Rehabilitation (BRECOR) Program for Self-managed Upper-Body Rehabilitation for Women With Breast Cancer

2018· article· en· W2900109579 on OpenAlex
Bolette Skjødt Rafn, Carina Nees, Julie Midtgaard, Pat G. Camp, Jette Vibe-Petersen, Kristin L. Campbell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRehabilitation Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationBreast cancerMedicinePhysical therapyUpper bodyCancerPhysical fitness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Survivors of breast cancer experience upper-body issues. Objectives: To develop and evaluate a rehabilitation program (BRECOR) to support self-managed upper-body rehabilitation after treatment for breast cancer. Design: Development and feasibility study. Setting: Community-based. Participants: Development of program elements (clinical assessment tool, education pamphlet, and Website) was informed by 17 physical therapists with experience in oncology rehabilitation and 10 women with breast cancer. Feasibility was evaluated by 35 women who had recently undergone surgery for breast cancer and 29 women who had completed surgery and radiation therapy for breast cancer. Intervention: Participants performed an individualized 12-week self-managed upper-body rehabilitation program informed by the clinical assessment tool, with support from the education pamphlet and the Website. Measurements: Recruitment/retention rates, adherence, capacity, and participant satisfaction were collected to establish feasibility. Results: Feedback from the physical therapists was instrumental in developing the program content. User testing refined the program elements. Participant feedback in the feasibility testing was positive with good recruitment (80%), retention (83%), and adherence (72%) to the self-managed upper-body rehabilitation program. Participants improved their upper-body function and reported benefit from the program. Limitations: The effectiveness of the BRECOR program in improving upper-body function cannot be determined, as this was a single-group feasibility study. Conclusion: A feasible, self-managed upper-body rehabilitation program was developed through iterative stages of program development and feasibility testing. The BRECOR program elements provide a toolkit to enforce qualified upper-body assessment, provide rehabilitation prescriptions, and support self-managed upper-body rehabilitation after treatment for breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it