MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2900113350 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.180450

Patient engagement in pediatric concussion research

2018· article· en· W2900113350 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Nick Reed, Kathy Leeder, Roger Zemek

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersOntario Neurotrauma Foundation
KeywordsConcussionMedicineInjury preventionPoison controlHuman factors and ergonomicsSuicide preventionPhysical therapyPediatricsMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS Concussion is a brain injury that affects hundreds of thousands of Canadian children and youth annually, along with their families. Visit rates for concussion have quadrupled since 2003,[1][1] with nearly 30 000 doctor visits for pediatric concussion per year in Ontario alone.[2][2]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.098
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.098
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→