An improved geomechanical model for the prediction of fracture generation and distribution in brittle reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is generally difficult to predict fractures of low-permeability reservoirs under high confining pressures by data statistical method and simplified strain energy density method. In order to establish a series of geomechanical models for the prediction of multi-scale fractures in brittle tight sandstones, firstly, through a series of rock mechanics experiments and CT scanning, we determined 0.85 σc as the key thresholds for mass release of elastic strain energy and bursting of micro-fractures. A correlation between fracture volume density and strain energy density under uniaxial stress state was developed based on the Theory of Geomechanics. Then using the combined Mohr-Coulomb criterion and Griffith's criterion and considering the effect of filling degree in fractures, we continued to modify and deduce the mechanical models of fracture parameters under complex stress states. Finally, all the geomechanical equations were loaded into the finite element (FE) platform to quantitatively simulate the present-day 3-D distributions of fracture density, aperture, porosity, permeability and occurrence based on paleostructure restoration of the Keshen anticline. Its predictions agreed well with in-situ core observations and formation micro-imaging (FMI) interpretations. The prediction results of permeability were basically consistent with the unobstructed flow distributions before and after the reservoir reformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".