A novel link between Cell Wall Integrity pathway and Flocculation, regulated by yeast Sen1 dependent interplay between Rlm1 and Tup1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae is one of the most studied organisms used for the synthesis of products, to explore the human diseases and eukaryotic gene expression mechanisms. The yeast cells with flocculation property are in high demand for industrial applications. However, the pathogenic yeast becomes drug-resistant due to flocculation/biofilm phenotype. The flocculation property of yeast depends on the expression of specific FLO genes. Genetic and epigenetic factors have been suggested to induce the expression of FLO s and flocculation, an evolutionarily conserved process. The present study was undertaken to identify a molecular link between stress caused by genetic and epigenetic factors and expression of FLO s. We utilized flocculating yeast strains to study the regulation of FLO genes and flocculation phenotype. We found rough surface morphology and constitutive activation of Slt2 in flocculating cells. The external cell wall stress factors as well as specific mutations in Sen1 and histone proteins strongly correlated with the induction of FLO genes whereas deletion of SLT2 / RLM1 , suppressed the expression and flocculation phenotype. We detected constitutive binding of Rlm1 and eviction of Tup1 from the promoters of FLO1 and FLO5 genes in flocculating cells. Thus we provide evidence for the CWI pathway dependent flocculation of yeast, regulated by Sen1 mediated interplay between Tup1 and Rlm1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".