Biological Potential of Extracts of Caatinga Plants in the Control of Alternaria alternata f. sp. citri in Citrus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brazil the Caatinga biome is formed by endemic species with numerous applications in medicine, cosmetics and agrochemicals. However, only 8% of the country’s plant species are chemically evaluated annually. Thus, the work aimed to determine the free amino acid composition and phenolic substances of Caatinga plant species extracts, their antioxidant activity and the potential use of these compounds in the control of A. alternata in citrus. Leaf extracts from fourteen native plant species were evaluated for free amino acid contents; total and individual polyphenols; total flavonoids and antifungal susceptibility test. The relationship between the contents of the compounds detected in each plant extract with its antioxidant capacity and antifungal activity, has not yet been fully clarified. However, it is a fact that the extract of Cleome hassleriana constitutes a source rich in free amino acids. It is also verified that the extracts of Mimosa tenuiflora and Caesalpinia ferrea are efficient alternatives in the control of Alternaria alternata in citrus, because they present similar results for this purpose, and in the evaluation of their compositions in free amino acids, phenolic substances and antioxidant activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it