MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900570129 · doi:10.1353/nin.2016.0032

Imploding the Memories

2016· article· en· W2900570129 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kevin Hogg

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceArt historyClearancePilgrimageVisual artsArtDreamHistoryPsychologyMedicineArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Imploding the Memories Kevin Hogg (bio) 7 a.m., 3/21/04A grey cloud risesVeterans Stadium falls58 seconds end 32 yearsNow the Phanatic don’t dance here no more Home to Schmidt, Carlton, Charlie Hustleand the trophyending 97 heartbreaking yearsReduced to dust in early morningAnd the Phanatic don’t dance here no more Seats stung, turf cut and bruisedEven hot dogs disappointedBut this cookie-cutter parkwas the center of many worldsNow the Phanatic don’t dance here no more Each game someone’s pilgrimage,dream fulfilled, check on a listMy day came fall ’88Expos in, Schmidt outand a scalper unloaded skyboxFive bucks for game, food, and drinksuntil rain in the sixth [End Page 239] Redeemed by the full show the next dayTwo thrilling games, two sad memoriesfor Youppie’s out of a jobAnd the Phanatic don’t dance here no more Greater parks come, greater parks goCBP sprung up nearbyRubble cleared and pavedMarkers show the old basesbut memories lie beneathFor the Phanatic don’t dance here no more [End Page 240] Kevin Hogg kevin hogg is a teacher, writer, and Chicago Cubs fan. He holds a Master of Arts degree from Carleton University. His research interests include baseball history, and he has published sports biographies in seven encyclopedias. Copyright © 2018 University of Nebraska Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.011
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207