Enhanced Swelling and Barrier Properties Stability of SPEEKbased Polymer Electrolytes Nanocomposite Membran
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study is to prepare SPEEK/Cloisite15A®/TAP nanocomposite membranes and to characterize their physicochemical properties as polymeric electrolyte nanocomposites. SPEEK membranes with various degrees of sulfonation (DS) were first prepared. Subsequently, 1 wt. % of Cloisite15A® and 2,4, 6–triaminopyrimidine (TAP), respectively, were introduced into the SPEEK matrices via solution intercalation method. The Cloisite15A® and TAP additives were used as reinforcing material for the SPEEK/Cloisite15A®/TAP (SP/CL/TAP) nanocomposite membranes in terms of the barrier properties, swelling and morphological structure. The effect of DS on the SP/CL/ TAP nanocomposite membranes was studied in terms of their swelling behavior, proton conductivity and methanol permeability. Field emission scanning electron micrographs (FESEM) and X–Ray diffraction (XRD) patterns confirmed that the Cloisite15A® particles were completely distributed to allow the nanosize dispersion in the polymer matrix. The swelling behavior of SPEEK membrane at DS of 88% was improved in the presence of Cloisite15A® and TAP. All SPEEK nanocomposite membranes studied exhibited improved methanol barrier properties compared with the parent SPEEK membranes. Owing to significant conductivity, remarkable barrier properties, high swelling stability and outperformed DMFC performance, SP63/CL/TAP nanocomposite membranes can be considered as a polymer electrolyte membrane for DMFC applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it