Inexact rough-interval type-2 fuzzy stochastic optimization model supporting municipal solid waste management under uncertainty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, an inexact rough-interval type-2 fuzzy stochastic linear programming (IRIT2FSLP) approach is developed for addressing uncertainties presented as rough-interval, type-2 fuzzy and random variables. The proposed method is applied to the case of a long-term municipal solid waste management system. The IRIT2FSLP approach is an extension of the inexact interval linear programming for handling nonlinear stochastic optimization problems where rough-interval and type-2 fuzzy parameters are integrated into a general framework. The results indicate that IRIT2FSLP normally leads to rough-interval solutions. Comparisons of the proposed model with scenarios without rough-interval and type-2 fuzzy parameters are also conducted. The results indicate the significant impact of dual-uncertain information on the system, which implies the reliability of IRIT2FSLP in handling waste flow allocation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it