Direct interaction between the PRDM3 and PRDM16 tumor suppressors and the NuRD chromatin remodeling complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aberrant isoform expression of chromatin-associated proteins can induce epigenetic programs related to disease. The MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus (MECOM) encodes PRDM3, a protein with an N-terminal PR-SET domain, as well as a shorter isoform, EVI1, lacking the N-terminus containing the PR-SET domain (ΔPR). Imbalanced expression of MECOM isoforms is observed in multiple malignancies, implicating EVI1 as an oncogene, while PRDM3 has been suggested to function as a tumor suppressor through an unknown mechanism. To elucidate functional characteristics of these N-terminal residues, we compared the protein interactomes of the full-length and ΔPR isoforms of PRDM3 and its closely related paralog, PRDM16. Unlike the ΔPR isoforms, both full-length isoforms exhibited a significantly enriched association with components of the NuRD chromatin remodeling complex, especially RBBP4. Typically, RBBP4 facilitates chromatin association of the NuRD complex by binding to histone H3 tails. We show that RBBP4 binds to the N-terminal amino acid residues of PRDM3 and PRDM16, with a dissociation constant of 3.0 μM, as measured by isothermal titration calorimetry. Furthermore, high-resolution X-ray crystal structures of PRDM3 and PRDM16 N-terminal peptides in complex with RBBP4 revealed binding to RBBP4 within the conserved histone H3-binding groove. These data support a mechanism of isoform-specific interaction of PRDM3 and PRDM16 with the NuRD chromatin remodeling complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".