MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 14857: Infarcted Hearts Respond Better to Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy After Pre-treatment With a Collagen Hydrogel

2015· article· en· W2900692597 on OpenAlexaff
Kay Maeda, Ghazaleh Rafatian, Richard J. Seymour, Marc Ruel, Darryl R. Davis, Erik J. Suuronen

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStem-cell therapyStem cellCell therapyCardiologyMesenchymal stem cellHeart failureInternal medicinePathologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cell therapy is a promising approach for repairing the injured myocardium. However, cells delivered too soon after myocardial infarction (MI) suffer from low retention and survival due to the harsh inflammatory post-MI milieu. In addition, autologous cells such as cardiac stem cells (CSCs) require time for isolation and culture prior to use, which precludes their delivery soon after MI. However, biomaterial therapy is not limited by these factors and can be applied in acute MI to limit myocardial damage. In this study, we treated the myocardium at the time of MI with a collagen matrix in order to prime the healing post-infarct environment and improve the efficacy of CSC therapy delivered late after MI. Methods/Results: C57BL/6J mice underwent LAD ligation to induce MI. Mice were then randomized to receive intramyocardial injection of PBS or matrix treatment at 3h post-MI, followed by PBS or 5х105 eGFP-CSCs at 7d post-MI. In total, 4 groups were evaluated: 1) 3h PBS/7d PBS (n=7), 2) 3h PBS/7d CSC (n=11), 3) 3h matrix/7d PBS (n=6) and 4) 3h matrix/7d CSC (n=12). Treatment with the matrix at 3h (groups 3 and 4) improved cardiac LVEF at 1wk post-MI (42.4±2.7%) compared to PBS-treated mice (groups 1 and 2; 37.9±3.7%; p=0.0004). After 4wk, the matrix/CSC treated mice (group 4) had superior LVEF (45.3±3.9%) compared to all other groups (29.4±3.9%, 35.9±2.5% and 40.1±4.0% for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively; p≤0.02). Immunostaining for GFP+ cells revealed 1.5-fold greater CSC retention in the myocardium of matrix pre-treated mice (p=0.04). Vascular density (# of CD31+ capillaries/FOV) in the infarct area was 2.5-fold greater in PBS/CSC mice than in PBS-treated mice (group 1; p=0.001), and increased further in the matrix/CSC group (1.4-fold vs. group 2; p=0.03). The matrix/CSC treated mice (group 4) had significantly reduced scar size (% scar/total myocardial area) (by ≥40%; p≤0.002) and better preserved ventricular wall thickness (by ≥15%; p≤0.02) compared to all other treatment groups. Conclusion: Collagen matrix treatment in acute MI primes the injured heart to be more responsive to CSC therapy. This may constitute a plausible synergistic strategy to protect the myocardium and improve the benefits that can be achieved with cell therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207