MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900694286 · doi:10.1002/adfm.201806770

Direct Observation of Core–Shell Structures in Individual Lead Titanate Ferroelectric Nanostructures by Tip‐Enhanced Refractive Index Mapping

2018· article· en· W2900694286 on OpenAlexafffund
Mischa Nicklaus, Gitanjali Kolhatkar, Julien Plathier, Chahinez Dab, Andreas Ruëdiger

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNear-Field Optical Microscopy
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceFerroelectricityRaman spectroscopyDielectricPhase transitionCondensed matter physicsLead titanateNanostructureRefractive indexLuminescencePolarization (electrochemistry)PlasmonOpticsOptoelectronicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ferroelectrics undergo a size‐driven phase transition at the nanoscale below which the spontaneous polarization, their defining property, irrevocably ceases. This threshold often referred to as the superparaelectric limit has tremendous technological relevance in an era of progressing integration. Just as the balance of short‐range elastic and long‐range electrostatic ordering in bulk, the critical size depends on temperature. Room‐temperature tip‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) imaging of individual lead titanate (PbTiO3) nanoislands is reported with a spatial resolution of ≈3 nm. Monitoring the spectral shift of the gold‐tip enhanced luminescence, which depends on the local refractive index, images grains composing the nanoislands. The wavelength of the enhanced luminescence shifts between the grains and their boundaries indicating the predicted core–shell structure of ferroelectric and paraelectric phase. The shear force configuration rules out the distance dependence of capacitive plasmonic coupling between tip and substrate as the origin of the observed shift. As the reported temperature‐changes in nonresonant TERS do not account for noticeable thermal effects, the underlying, even though weak, tip‐enhanced Raman spectrum of the grain core reflects PbTiO3 close to the ferroelectric‐to‐paraelectric phase transition which is primarily related to the finite size of the grains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicNear-Field Optical MicroscopyFrench-language works237,207