Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pres de trente-cinq ans apres la dissolution du mythique groupe Harmonium, Serge Fiori se livre a Louise Theriault, qui dresse de lui un portrait tout en nuances, plein d'empathie mais jamais complaisant. Grâce a des dizaines d'heures d'entrevues ? tant avec Fiori lui-meme qu'avec ceux qui ont jalonne sa vie personnelle et professionnelle ?, l'auteure nous relate, depuis son enfance italienne jusqu'a l'eclosion de son immense talent, comment Serge est devenu Fiori, comment Harmonium est ne et a vecu, dans un Quebec en pleine effervescence culturelle et politique. Sa relation a son pere et a sa mere, sa peur de la folie, sa spiritualite, son rapport complexe aux autres musiciens, son engagement politique, le culte de la personnalite que lui vouent ses admirateurs et qui le depasse, les raisons de son retrait de la vie publique; rien n'echappe a la plume tout en finesse de Louise Theriault, qui fut son amoureuse, puis son amie et sa confidente. Elle nous raconte la carriere desormais dans l'ombre que mene Serge Fiori depuis cette rupture, depuis qu'il s'est «enleve du chemin», ronge par le doute et l'angoisse, et sa vie personnelle jusqu'a aujourd'hui. Un portrait fascinant, un plongeon au c?ur de l'âme et de la fragilite d'un homme qui a consacre sa vie a la musique, mais dont l'ego n'a jamais atteint l'immense ampleur de son talent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".