In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol, a Siderophore Cephalosporin, Against Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated by Clinical Laboratories in North America and Europe in 2015-2016: SIDERO-WT-2015
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Cefiderocol (S-649266) is a parenteral siderophore cephalosporin in phase III of clinical development. In this study, we determined the in vitro susceptibility to cefiderocol and comparators of a 2015-2016 collection of 8954 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), provided by 100 clinical laboratories in North America and Europe, using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method. Iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth was used to test cefiderocol. The concentration of cefiderocol inhibiting 90% of isolates (MIC 90 ) was 0.5 mg/L (North America; n =2470) and 1 mg/L (Europe; n =3,543) for Enterobacteriaceae, 0.5 mg/L (North America; n =619) and 0.5 mg/L (Europe; n =921) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 1 mg/L (North America; n =308) and 2 mg/L (Europe; n =664) for Acinetobacter spp., 0.5 mg/L (North America; n =165) and 0.25 mg/L (Europe; n =175) for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , and 0.12 mg/L (North America; n =40) and 0.5 mg/L (Europe; n =49) for Burkholderia cepacia complex spp. Cefiderocol MICs were ≤4 mg/L for 99.9% (6005/6013) of Enterobacteriaceae, 99.9% (1539/1540) of P. aeruginosa , 96.4% (937/972) of Acinetobacter spp., 99.4% (338/340) of S. maltophilia , and 94.4% (84/89) of Burkholderia cepacia complex spp. isolates tested. Against meropenem-non-susceptible isolates, MICs to cefiderocol were ≤4 mg/L for 99.6% (245/246) of Enterobacteriaceae, 99.7% (394/395) of P. aeruginosa , 96.1% (540/562) of Acinetobacter spp., and 87.1% (27/31) of B. cepacia complex spp. We conclude that cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity (MIC ≤4 mg/L) against the majority (99.4%, 8903/8954) of clinical isolates of GNB in a recent (2015-2016), multi-continent collection, including carbapenem-non-susceptible isolates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".