MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900828899 · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2018.11.010

Measuring cognitive impairment in young adults with polysubstance use disorder with MoCA or BRIEF-A – The significance of psychiatric symptoms

2018· article· en· W2900828899 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Egon Hagen, Mikael Julius Sømhovd, Morten Hesse, Espen Ajo Arnevik, Aleksander H. Erga

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRegionalt Kompetansesenter for Rusmiddelforskning i Helse Vest
KeywordsPolysubstance dependencePsychiatryPsychologyCognitionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitive impairmentYoung adultClinical psychologyMedicineDevelopmental psychologySubstance abuse

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Chronic polysubstance use disorder (PSUD) is associated with cognitive impairments. These impairments affect the quality of life, occupational functioning, and the ability to benefit from therapy. Psychological distress also affects neurocognitive status, and impaired neurocognition characterizes several psychiatric conditions. Neurocognitive assessment is thus of importance but faces several interpretive challenges. One is disentangling the link between psychological distress and cognitive impairment. This paper investigates the associations between psychological distress and two cognitive screening tools, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) in young adults with PSUD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 104 patients with PSUD recruited from the Norwegian Stayer study. Participants completed the MoCA, a self-report measure of executive functioning (EF), the BRIEF-A, and the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised, a measure of psychiatric symptoms (SCL-90-R). Cognitive impairment was diagnosed in accordance with previously published cutoff scores for the MoCA and BRIEF-A. Correlation analysis and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between cognitive impairment identified with the MoCA or BRIEF-A and psychological distress. RESULTS: More than a third (34.6%) of patients scored below the threshold for cognitive impairment on the MoCA. On the BRIEF-A, 63.2% of participants reported executive problems that exceeded what was expected based on previously published norms. SCL-90-R scores were, as expected, elevated when compared with normative scores. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between cognitive impairment identified by the BRIEF-A and scores on the SCL-90-R Global Severity Index (OR = 17.3, 95% CI: 4.4-68.8, p < 0.001) and age (OR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.6-0.9, p = 0.003). Cognitive impairment identified by the MoCA was not significantly associated with demographic variables or SCL-90-R GSI score in multiple regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that the MoCA is a measure of cognitive impairment that is independent of psychological distress, as measured with the SCL-90-R, whereas the BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite is strongly associated with distress. This suggests the need to interpret BRIEF-A results within a broad differential diagnostic context, where the assessment of psychological distress is included. The findings support that performance-based assessment such as the MoCA could reduce the impact of psychological distress in cognitive screening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Substance Abuse TreatmentSame topicOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchFrench-language works237,207